ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Association between findings in nailfold capillaroscopy and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo systematically evaluate the association between nailfold capillaroscopic findings and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and compare findings in diabetic patients with and without DR.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to February 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment tool for Observational Cohort and Cross Sectional Studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the findings of nailfold capillaroscopy between diabetic patients with or without DR. Subgroup analysis was employed to investigate the source of heterogeneity.
resultsTotally 12 studies with 1349 diabetic patients were included, of which 628 had DR. The overall quality of included studies was acceptable. Patients with DR had increased arteriolar diameters [mean difference (MD): 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-4.72] and a higher risk of developing nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities, including bushy capillaries [odds ratio (OR): 2.82, 95%CI: 1.65-4.80], neoformation (OR: 4.61, 95%CI: 3.15-6.76), megacapillaries (OR: 8.37, 95%CI: 5.07-13.80), tortuosity (OR: 7.29, 95%CI: 2.76-19.22), microhemorrhages (OR: 6.16, 95%CI: 2.48-15.26), meandering capillaries (OR: 4.68, 95%CI: 1.05-20.80) and avascular areas (OR: 7.92, 95%CI: 2.68-23.38). The presence of tortuous capillary was more common in DR in India than in Turkey, while avascular area in the nailfolds was linked to DR only in India (OR: 11.28, 95%CI: 3.91-32.60). Among the nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities, tortuosity, microhemorrhage, and meandering capillary showed no significant correlation with the severity of DR, except for avascular area (
conclusionThere are significant associations between nailfold capillaroscopic findings and the presence of DR, supporting its potential as a non-invasive technique for monitoring microvascular changes in diabetic patients. However, further research is needed to validate its utility as an early screening tool for microvascular complications in diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.