Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534896›Full record

ArticleDigital health

How the affordance and psychological empowerment promoting AI-based medical consultation usage: A mixed-methods approach.

Song Zhang, Benhao Han, Mengnan Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Song ZhangSchool of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China.
Benhao HanSchool of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2282-1363
Mengnan FanSchool of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3673-8726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study establishes a research model based on the theories of affordance and the theory of psychological empowerment to understand users' intentions in using artificial intelligence-based medical consultations (AIMCs), offering implications for their effective design. Methods: A two-stage mixed-methods research design was employed. The first stage involved qualitative interviews to conceptualize the main affordances of AIMCs and usage intentions, and the second phase comprised a quantitative study with 425 valid samples analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results: The research results identified four AIMC affordances (i.e., human-AI interaction, human-like diagnosis, personalized treatment, and health information security) and two usage intentions (i.e., assist health decisions, and relieve health anxiety). The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that the four affordances significantly enhance perceived cognitive empowerment, whereas three affordances (excluding health information security) positively influence perceived emotional empowerment. Both cognitive and emotional empowerments were found to significantly affect users' AIMCs usage intentions. Additionally, we found that different disease types (acute and chronic) play an important moderating role in the relationship between perceived cognitive empowerment and relieve health anxiety. Conclusions: To increase psychological motivation and user adoption, AIMCs should be optimized with intuitive interactions, human-like diagnoses, and personalized care, while features should be tailored to the needs associated with acute and chronic conditions. On the basis of affordance and psychological empowerment theories, this study provides actionable insights for the development, design, and implementation of AIMCs.

Indexed as

affordanceAI-based medical consultationcognitive empowermentemotional empowermentmixed-methodsqualitative analysisstructural equation model

Identifiers

PMID40534896
PMCPMC12174797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.