ArticleDigital health
How the affordance and psychological empowerment promoting AI-based medical consultation usage: A mixed-methods approach.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How GAI Shapes Travelers' Booking Decisions: The Influence of Source Disclosure and Valence of Creative Reviews.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable AI for Well-Being Prediction From Lifestyle Data: 2-Study Design.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Trusting and staying with AI doctors: cognitive and emotional pathways driving continuance intention toward AI healthcare chatbots.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI literacy and creative self-beliefs among Chinese college students: examining the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impact of AI Literacy on Well-Being Among Nursing Students-Mediating Roles of Empowerment and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2025Article
- Leveraging mobile fitness apps for healthier lifestyles: How affordances drive sustained engagement.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study establishes a research model based on the theories of affordance and the theory of psychological empowerment to understand users' intentions in using artificial intelligence-based medical consultations (AIMCs), offering implications for their effective design. Methods: A two-stage mixed-methods research design was employed. The first stage involved qualitative interviews to conceptualize the main affordances of AIMCs and usage intentions, and the second phase comprised a quantitative study with 425 valid samples analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results: The research results identified four AIMC affordances (i.e., human-AI interaction, human-like diagnosis, personalized treatment, and health information security) and two usage intentions (i.e., assist health decisions, and relieve health anxiety). The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that the four affordances significantly enhance perceived cognitive empowerment, whereas three affordances (excluding health information security) positively influence perceived emotional empowerment. Both cognitive and emotional empowerments were found to significantly affect users' AIMCs usage intentions. Additionally, we found that different disease types (acute and chronic) play an important moderating role in the relationship between perceived cognitive empowerment and relieve health anxiety. Conclusions: To increase psychological motivation and user adoption, AIMCs should be optimized with intuitive interactions, human-like diagnoses, and personalized care, while features should be tailored to the needs associated with acute and chronic conditions. On the basis of affordance and psychological empowerment theories, this study provides actionable insights for the development, design, and implementation of AIMCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.