ReviewCureus2025
Comparing Proton Pump Inhibitors and Emerging Acid-Suppressive Therapies in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tegoprazan in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Related Acid-Mediated Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers in Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus alternative acid-suppressive strategies in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), yielding 877 records, of which five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. These studies examined the effectiveness of newer agents such as potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), including vonoprazan, fexuprazan, and tegoprazan, as well as the use of mucosal protective agents and varied PPI administration strategies (on-demand vs. continuous). Findings indicated that P-CABs are noninferior or superior to PPIs in terms of symptom relief and mucosal healing, with tegoprazan demonstrating faster symptom control. Long-term use of vonoprazan was associated with higher gastrin levels and histological changes, although no malignant outcomes were reported. The addition of mucosal protective agents to PPI therapy enhanced histological remission and symptom control. On-demand PPI use showed similar outcomes to continuous use, suggesting it may be a viable option for certain patient populations. Overall, the review supports the growing role of individualized and alternative pharmacologic approaches in the effective management of GERD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.