Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535486›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2025

Cardiac transplantation: A review of current status and emerging innovations.

Umashri Sundararaju, Srinivas Rachoori, Abdulkader Mohammad, Hamrish Kumar Rajakumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umashri SundararajuDepartment of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 600002, Tamil Nādu, India.
Srinivas RachooriDepartment of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 600002, Tamil Nādu, India.
Abdulkader MohammadDepartment of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia.
Hamrish Kumar RajakumarDepartment of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 600002, Tamil Nādu, India. hamrishkumar2003@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart transplantation (HTx) is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage heart failure and has undergone remarkable advancements since the first successful transplant in 1967. The introduction of cyclosporine in the 1970s significantly improved patient outcomes, leading to a global increase in transplants, including in India, where the practice has grown despite initial challenges. This review provides an extensive overview of HTx, focusing on current practices, technological advancements, and the ongoing challenges the field faces today. It explores the evolution of surgical techniques, such as minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures, and the management of posttransplant rejection through tailored immunosuppressive strategies, including new monoclonal antibodies and personalized therapies. The review also highlights emerging innovations such as mechanical circulatory support devices and xenotransplantation as potential solutions to donor shortages while acknowledging the ethical and logistical challenges these approaches entail. Furthermore, the analysis delves into the implications of using extended-criteria donors and the role of multidisciplinary teams in evaluating absolute and relative contraindications. Despite the progress made, the persistent issues of organ scarcity and ethical concerns underscore the need for ongoing research and innovation to further enhance the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of HTx.

Indexed as

Donor managementDonor selectionEnd-stage heart failureHeart transplantationImmunosuppressionMechanical circulatory supportRegenerative medicineSurgical techniquesTransplantation outcomesXenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40535486
PMCPMC11886295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.