ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Analysis of short-term efficacy and rebleeding risk in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients undergoing vascular intervention.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the short-term efficacy and rebleeding risk of vascular intervention in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).
methodsThis retrospective study included 98 aSAH patients treated between August 2020 and May 2023. Based on the treatment method, patients were divided into an interventional group (n = 50, treated with endovascular embolization) and a craniotomy group (n = 48, treated with microsurgical clipping). Surgical parameters, clinical outcomes, immune markers, prognosis scores, cognitive function, and safety were compared using t-tests or chi-square tests. Binary logistic regression identified independent risk factors for clinical outcomes and rebleeding.
resultsThe interventional group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and shorter operative times compared to the craniotomy group (all
conclusionVascular intervention provides superior short-term efficacy in aSAH patients, with faster recovery, reduced surgical trauma, and better clinical outcomes compared to craniotomy. Monitoring should be intensified for older patients and those with higher preoperative Hunt-Hess grades to minimize the risks of poor prognosis and rebleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.