Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535757›Full record

ReviewCardiology discovery2025

Challenges and Opportunities for Atrial Fibrillation Management.

Minsi Cai, Jordi Heijman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minsi CaiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229HX, The Netherlands.
Jordi HeijmanDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229HX, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with poor clinical outcomes and a huge economic burden on healthcare systems. Optimized anticoagulation, better symptom control via rhythm or rate control, and comprehensive comorbidity/risk factor management are 3 essential pillars of current AF management, where much progress has been made during the past decades. However, numerous challenges in AF management remain at the disease, patient, and population levels, including an incomplete understanding of basic mechanisms that can be clinically targeted; heterogenous progressive natural history; poor correlation between rhythm and symptoms/outcomes; as well as suboptimal detection methods and treatment options. Recent advances in disease perception in combination with modern monitoring devices, state-of-the art computational models, and novel antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation strategies can contribute to addressing these issues, ultimately leading to a paradigm shift in AF diagnosis, classification, and treatment. This narrative review summarizes these key challenges and future opportunities in the field of AF management.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationPathophysiologyPrecision medicineRhythm controlTranslational challenges

Identifiers

PMID40535757
PMCPMC12173171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.