Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535933›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Do ecological valid stop signals aid detour performance? A comparison of four bird species.

Anneleen Dewulf, Clara Garcia-Co, Wendt Müller, Joah Robert Madden, An Martel, Luc Lens, Frederick Verbruggen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anneleen DewulfCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-0421
Clara Garcia-CoCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-5940
Wendt MüllerDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology and Eco-Physiology Group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4095
Joah Robert MaddenCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-0967
An MartelDepartment of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Wildlife Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-5649
Luc LensCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-2215
Frederick VerbruggenCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-0719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition (RI), or the stopping of actions, is considered a key component of flexible and adaptive behaviour. Across fields, RI is often treated as a unitary cognitive mechanism. However, we propose that RI consists of a chain of cognitive processes, including the detection of a stimulus, the selection of an appropriate behaviour (go or stop) and the implementation of it (execution or inhibition of a motor response). From this, we propose that individual variation in RI can arise at the early signal detection stage. This idea was tested in a detour barrier task, which is one of the most popular tools to study RI in non-human animals. The role of signal detection in detour tasks has been largely neglected, with a few notable exceptions. We therefore partially replicated two previous studies that manipulated the perceptual characteristics of the barrier, while addressing some conceptual and methodological shortcomings of the original work. Specifically, we compared how detour performance of four bird species (i.e. white leghorn chickens, Japanese quails, herring gulls and domestic canaries) is differently influenced by vertical-bar (VB) and horizontal-bar (HB) barriers. In contrast to the previous work, performance on the detour task did not improve when the perceptual characteristics of the barrier matched the ecological niche of the species. However, all species showed some level of learning, as evidenced by shorter detour latencies (except in herring gulls) and fewer persisting attempts. These findings highlight the need for replication studies and emphasize the importance of improving methodological and conceptual design factors to further investigate the underlying mechanisms of RI in animals. Preregistered Stage 1 protocol: https://osf.io/qvxgh (date of in-principle acceptance: 20/03/2023).

Indexed as

birdscomparative approachdetourresponse inhibitionstop-signal detection

Identifiers

PMID40535933
PMCPMC12174936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.