Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536556›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robot-assisted gynecologic surgery in elderly patients: perioperative outcomes and risk assessment in patients aged 70 years and older.

Mai Nakazono, Mika Mizuno, Shinichi Togami, Hikaru Hobara, Motohisa Onigahara, Mika Fukuda, Hiroaki Kobayashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mai NakazonoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Mika MizunoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. mizunomizuno512@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-8315
Shinichi TogamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hikaru HobaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Motohisa OnigaharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Mika FukudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery has become widely accepted as a minimally invasive approach. However, its safety and feasibility in older women undergoing gynecologic procedures remain insufficiently explored. This retrospective study compared perioperative outcomes between two older age groups and evaluated surgical risks by using the E-PASS and POSSUM scoring systems. A total of 61 women aged ≥ 70 years who underwent robot-assisted gynecologic surgery at our institution were analyzed. Endometrial cancer cases involved hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy, while procedures for pelvic organ prolapse included sacrocolpopexy with vaginal surgery. The patients were categorized into pre-old (70-74 years) and old (75-89 years) groups. Although prior abdominal surgery was significantly more common in the old group (58.3 vs. 13.5%, p = 0.0003), no significant differences were found in comorbidities, the operative time (242 vs. 235 min), blood loss, or the duration of hospital stay. One pre-old patient developed a pelvic infection (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa); no other serious complications occurred, and overall complication rates were similar. Two cases of postoperative delirium were not predicted preoperatively. Perioperative risk scores indicated a low risk in both groups. While midterm postoperative outcomes were generally favorable, some patients experienced new health-related events, which were unrelated to surgery. These findings suggest that robotic surgery is feasible and that age alone should not be a contraindication. However, importantly, these outcomes were achieved in a cohort that received comprehensive perioperative care; therefore, further studies with larger cohorts are needed. Moreover, perioperative planning should consider not only physical conditions but also the cognitive and mental status, the living environment, and social support.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLength of StayOperative TimePelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeEndometrial cancerOlder patientsPelvic organ prolapsePerioperative complicationsRobotic surgeryTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.