ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Real-world study on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity outcomes in cancer patients with select DPYD variant alleles that received DPYD genotype-guided dosing.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DPYD and UGT1A1 Genotype-Based Dosing for Fluoropyrimidines and Irinotecan Chemotherapy: Variant-Specific Impact on Treatment Intensity and Toxicity.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- The Impact of Upfront DihydroPyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Testing on the Therapeutic Management of Patients Scheduled for 5-FU.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Genetic Variants Associated with Fluoropyrimidine-Induced Toxicity in Real-World Patients After Pre-EmptivePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world study on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity outcomes in cancer patients with select DPYD variant alleles that received DPYD genotype-guided dosing.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DPYD gene variations are associated with severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity, and an initial 50% dose reduction is widely recommended for heterozygous carriers of relevant DPYD variants, including DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, and c.1236G>A. However, there is a high variability in DPD activity between DPYD variant carriers, and a proportion of patients may tolerate higher fluoropyrimidine doses. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare fluoropyrimidine toxicity outcomes and tolerated dose intensities between different DPYD variant carriers that received DPYD genotype-guided dosing. We identified DPYD variant carriers that received fluoropyrimidine-based treatment between January 2015 and February 2021 in three Dutch Hospitals. The initial fluoropyrimidine dose was reduced by 25-50% for all heterozygous DPYD variant carriers following the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guideline. Toxicity outcomes were collected for the first three cycles. From 2112 consecutively DPYD-genotyped patients, 120 patients with DPYD variants were included. The frequency of overall severe toxicity was 21% for wild types, 27% for heterozygous DPYD variant carriers overall, 19% for c.1236G>A carriers, 38% for c.2846A>T carriers, and 44% for DPYD*2A carriers. Median relative dose intensity for cycles 1-3 was 71% for c.1236G>A carriers, 68% for c.2846A>T carriers, and 52% for DPYD*2A carriers. Despite good fluoropyrimidine tolerance in a large proportion of patients, only 13% of patients underwent dose escalation. Novel studies are highly needed to establish the optimal fluoropyrimidine starting dose for heterozygous carriers of c.1236G>A. After initial dose reduction, dose uptitration based on individual tolerance and therapeutic drug monitoring in all DPYD variant heterozygotes is advised to prevent the risk of underdosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.