Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536953›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2026

DNAJB6: A guardian against neurodegeneration.

Jónvá Hentze, Anna Gelman, Tomasz Brudek, Christian Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recent insights into HSP70: proteostasis and beyond.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jónvá HentzeDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna GelmanDepartment of Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tomasz BrudekResearch Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian HansenDepartment of Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-6876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid protein aggregation plays a major role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases and is likely the primary driving force for the progression of most of these diseases. Multiple recent studies have highlighted that the DNAJ homolog subfamily B member 6 (DNAJB6) chaperone is particularly interesting, when it comes to preventing amyloidogenic proteins from aggregating. It has been shown that DNAJB6 can prevent the aggregation of polyglutamine-expanded proteins in models of Huntington's disease. Likewise, it can suppress aggregation of α-synuclein in models of Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies. Finally, it has been shown that DNAJB6 can block aggregation of multiple additional amyloid proteins involved in Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies as well. We believe there is yet much to learn about the protective role of DNAJB6 in the brain, but this focused review summarizes, what we know so far of this chaperone. It describes the biological role of DNAJB6 in the brain and its interaction with Hsp70, with particular emphasis on the studies that show its ability to prevent amyloid protein aggregation in vitro and in vivo . Moreover, recent work on dysregulation of the expression of DNAJB6 in brain clinical tissue is discussed. Finally, we discuss potential therapeutic perspectives as we believe this protein is a promising druggable target.

Indexed as

aggregationchaperonesclinical tissuesDNAJB6human brainneurodegenerationneurodegenerative diseasestherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID40536953
PMCPMC13211831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.