Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537023›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs an Integral Part of Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.

Sylvie Lambert, Li-Anne Audet, Lydia Ould Brahim, Jamie Schaffler, Cecilia Garcia Ramirez, Francesca Frati, Sonya Sangha, A Fuchsia Howard, Leah Lambert

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvie LambertIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9202-9251
Li-Anne AudetIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lydia Ould BrahimIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jamie SchafflerSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Cecilia Garcia RamirezIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Francesca FratiSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University Libraries, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sonya SanghaBC Cancer Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
A Fuchsia HowardSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Leah LambertBC Cancer Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caregivers experience physical, psychological, emotional, and practical challenges resulting from their roles and responsibilities. These challenges negatively impact caregivers' health and well-being. Screening for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is now considered a cornerstone of chronic disease management to improve symptom identification and management, quality of life, and survival. Similarly, screening for family-reported outcomes (FROs) could help promote caregivers' health and well-being. Though family-reported outcome measure (FROM) screening programs have emerged, the nature and extent of their development and evaluation in the context of chronic disease remains unknown. This scoping review aimed to identify the extent to which FROM screening programs among caregivers of adults with a chronic disease have been developed and evaluated. PRISMA-ScR and the methods recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute were followed. Four electronic databases (Ovid- Medline(R), Ovid- Classic + Embase, Ovid-APA PsycInfo 1967-onwards, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) were searched iteratively to identify published literature describing FROM screening programs. Secondary search strategies and a search of grey literature were also undertaken. Data were extracted using a standardized table and analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. A total of 38 studies describing 17 unique FROM programs were evaluated. Studies were published between 1999-2024 and primarily from Australia (n = 11), the United States (n = 8), and the United Kingdom (n = 6). Caregivers included (n = 4312) were most commonly spouses of patients with cancer. Screening was primarily used to tailor interventions (rather than monitor symptoms) and focused on caregivers' needs (e.g., information, managing patient symptoms). Nurses typically responded to the screening. Most programs offered three types of follow-up: informational/educational resources, referrals to specialists or community groups, and/or real-time discussion and feedback with the interventionist. Although the FROM programs positively impacted proximal variables (e.g., preparedness), this did not translate to more distal outcomes (e.g., quality of life, anxiety). Future research on the timing of screening, caregiver engagement, and efficacious follow-up interventions is needed.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresChronic DiseaseDisease ManagementHumansQuality of Lifecancercaregiverschronic diseasedistress screeningfamily-reported outcome measures (FROMs)family-reported outcomes (FROs)patient-reported outcomes (PROs)scoping reviewscreening programsunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID40537023
PMCPMC12179453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.