ReviewNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2025
Musical Hallucinosis: Auditory Illusions After Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation.
Review in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detailed clinical characteristics of musical hallucinations in 81 patients.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Early Auditory Stimulation, Not Device Type: Comparable Cortical Maturation in Children Using Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Persistent auditory hallucinations despite hearing aid use in bilateral sensorineural hearing loss without evidence of psychosis.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundPhantom auditory percepts are especially prevalent in healthy persons with hearing loss. No first-person description of the not uncommon illusion called musical hallucinosis (MH) has been published in relation to possible neural mechanisms for its occurrence.ObjectivesThe author presents his personal experience following implantation of a unilateral cochlear neuroprosthesis to try to compensate for progressive sensorineural hearing loss.ResultsThe MH included abrupt onset of persistent, robust singing of the Star-Spangled Banner, then other familiar songs and nursery rhymes by a men's choir without accompanying instrumentals, followed months later by continuous nonsense lyrics sung to a simpler stereotyped tune. The onset was associated with deafness as a complication of electrode placement within the cochlea, the early sizzling, synthetic, monotonal auditory sounds heard using the cochlear implant, and a burst of cacophonous tinnitus following a higher volume adjustment to the device.ConclusionsSeveral physiological alterations, including deafferentation-induced spontaneous auditory pathway activity that triggers higher auditory cortical areas to place the ambiguous inputs within the individual's prior experience of sound patterns, may help explain the evolution of MH and its persistence as a type of maladaptive neuroplasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.