SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Causal inference in the diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer: current state and future directions.
Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-stage deep learning framework for ovarian tumor ultrasound classification with explainability and confidence estimation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies, characterized by low early detection rates and challenging prognostic assessment. Conventional diagnostic modalities demonstrate limited sensitivity and specificity for early-stage disease identification. Recent research has begun to explore causal inference methodologies as complementary approaches that may enhance diagnostic precision and prognostic capability. This systematic review evaluates the current state and future prospects of causal inference methodologies in enhancing ovarian cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We performed a comprehensive systematic review focusing on causal inference methodologies applied to ovarian cancer research. The analysis encompassed biomarker identification, pathogenic mechanism elucidation, and multimodal data integration. Additionally, we analyzed the synergistic combination of causal inference with machine learning approaches across genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and imaging datasets. Causal inference methods have shown effectiveness in identifying crucial biomarkers and revealing underlying pathogenic mechanisms of ovarian cancer. The integration of machine learning with causal inference has enhanced model interpretability, clinical applicability, and diagnostic-prognostic accuracy. These approaches have achieved improved predictions of disease progression and optimization of treatment strategies by leveraging clinical, genetic, and imaging data. Causal inference shows considerable potential in advancing precision medicine for ovarian cancer, offering robust frameworks for addressing confounding factors and establishing causal relationships. As these methodologies evolve and data volumes expand, their application may become increasingly valuable in oncology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40537725What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.