ArticleJournal of inflammation (London, England)2025
Intermittent methionine restriction and selenium supplementation protect against inflammation and the development of dermatitis.
Article in Journal of inflammation (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methionine restriction and mimetics to ameliorate human aging and disease.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Modulation of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Hepatic Injury by Chitosan-Coated Selenium Nanoparticles: Targeting the STEAP-3/TLR-4 and IL-17/TRAF-6/HSP-90 Axes.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary methionine restriction (MR) produces multiple metabolic health benefits and extends the healthspan of several model organisms, including rodents. MR is feasible for humans, and studies have reported that methionine-restricted human subjects receive similar benefits to rodents. However, long-term adherence to continuous MR is likely to be challenging (if not impossible) for many individuals. Another obstacle to the successful translation of this intervention is the fact that multiple deleterious effects of continuous MR have been reported for mice and humans, including loss of musculoskeletal mass, increased bone marrow adipogenesis, and an increased incidence of fractures. To address these issues, we developed two novel interventions that produce similar health benefits to continuous MR, but without the same deleterious side effects. The first is an intermittent form of MR (IMR) that requires only 3 days of reduced methionine intake per week; the second involves supplementation of an otherwise normal diet with sodium selenite. For the current study, we considered the possibility that these interventions might also prevent and/or ameliorate diet-induced chronic inflammation, as well as pathologies that result from this condition. Accordingly, we tested whether IMR or selenium supplementation were able to protect high-fat diet-fed mice against both inflammation and the development of inflammation-induced ulcerative dermatitis. Here, we show that high-fat diet-fed mice undergoing both interventions not only have relatively low levels of inflammation, but are also protected against the development of dermatitis. We also propose a model for the mechanistic basis of such benefits, which involves reduced activation of leptin-responsive pro-inflammatory pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.