ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Trends and disparities in place of death among patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A two-decade analysis.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and disparities in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma mortality in the United States, 1999-2024: a CDC WONDER analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most lethal primary hepatic malignancy. It has been well-reported that most cancer patients prefer to die at home or in a hospice facility. However, there is limited data on the place of death for CCA patients. We evaluated trends and disparities in place of death for patients with CCA from 1999 to 2020.
methodsUsing the CDC WONDER database (1999-2020), we calculated the frequency of CCA deaths at home/hospice and the average annual percentage change (AAPC) over this period stratified by race, age, gender, and region. We employed logistic regression to assess for associations between these variables and place of death for patients whose death was attributed to CCA.
resultsAmong 140,422 deaths, a rise in deaths occurred in home/hospice facilities compared to inpatient medical or nursing facilities across all variables examined. Blacks and individuals ≥ 85 had the highest proportion of deaths outside of home/hospice. However, Blacks showed the highest AAPC (8.56%) in home/hospice deaths, followed by Asians (AAPC 8.44%). In contrast, individuals aged 45-54 saw the lowest AAPC (4.27%). Non-whites were less likely to die at home/hospice, with Blacks demonstrating the lowest adjusted odds ratio (aOR 0.64). Those ≥ 85 were less likely to die in home/hospice (aOR 0.78), whereas individuals aged between 55-64 (aOR 1.11) and 65-74 (aOR 1.12) had increased odds of dying in these settings. Patients from the Western region were the most likely to die at home/hospice (aOR 1.04). SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsOur study highlights disparities in place of death of patients with CCA amongst races, regions, and ages. Non-whites, extremes of ages, and patients from the Northeast have disproportionately poor outcomes in terms of end-of-life care in the US. These findings emphasize the need for efforts to address sociodemographic disparities in end-of-life care to improve patient-centered health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.