Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Evaluating the link between insulin resistance and cognitive impairment using estimated glucose disposal rate in a non-diabetic aging population: results from the CHARLS.

Bingqing Wang, Fei Xu, Minheng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bingqing Wang *Department of Neurology, Taiyuan Central Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Fei Xu *Department of Neurology, Taiyuan Central Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Minheng ZhangDepartment of Gerontology, The First People's Hospital of Jinzhong, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests insulin resistance may contribute to neurodegeneration, yet its role in non-diabetic populations remains unclear. This study explores the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a measure of insulin sensitivity, and incident cognitive dysfunction in non-diabetic adults. Methods: Our longitudinal analysis utilized data from 5,178 CHARLS participants (age ≥ 45 years). Insulin sensitivity was quantified using eGDR, calculated from waist circumference, hypertension status, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Participants were stratified by eGDR quartiles for comparative analysis. We employed multivariable Cox models, survival curves, restricted cubic splines, and sensitivity testing to evaluate associations with cognitive outcomes. Results: Over an 8.7-year follow-up, cognitive dysfunction developed in 36.9% of participants. Analyses revealed significant metabolic-cognitive associations, with each standard deviation increase in eGDR linked to a 15.8% reduction in risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.792, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.793-0.881). Restricted cubic spline analysis identified non-linear threshold effects, with risk accelerating below certain eGDR levels ( Conclusion: These findings position eGDR as a promising biomarker for cognitive risk stratification in non-diabetic adults. However, further multi-database studies should validate these associations and explore the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

CHARLScognitive impairmentdiabetes mellitusestimated glucose disposal rateinsulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID40538401
PMCPMC12176753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.