ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Supporting Parental Decision-Making After Life-Limiting Fetal Diagnoses: The Role of Perinatal Hospice and the NOVA-L Decision Support System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision Support Systems and Artificial Intelligence in ADHD Assessment and Rehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges for Technology-Assisted Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Telehealth as a catalyst for smart rural development and sustainable tourism: a feasibility case study from Agrafa, Greece.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Advancing Equity in Breast Cancer Care Through Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equity in healthcare remains a pressing issue in cancer care across the European Union. Although numerous European initiatives address prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment, significant disparities in access to innovative cancer therapies persist. Time-to-reimbursement for new anticancer drugs varies widely between member states, depending on national health policies, economic capacity, and healthcare infrastructure. These differences particularly affect countries in Central and Eastern Europe, where delays in reimbursement, limited access to clinical trials, and restricted availability of specialized care contribute to worse outcomes. This narrative review examines how disparities in reimbursement timelines and access to new cancer therapies may affect factors such as early detection, specialized treatment availability, clinical trial participation, and socioeconomic status. The discussion is framed within the BEACON project, a European Union-funded initiative under the EU4Health programme. BEACON brings together patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers to create a cross-border network for quality-assured diagnosis and treatment. Through its multilingual digital platform, the project fosters collaboration, supports health literacy, and enhances access to innovative cancer therapies, aiming to reduce inequities regardless of geographic or socioeconomic background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.