Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Analysis of key factors and equity in influenza vaccination among Chinese adults-evidence from a large national cross-sectional survey.

Bo Dong, Hengxuan Xu, Ning Tang, Menghan Jiang, Zhihao Lei, Yue Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo Dong *School Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China.
Hengxuan Xu *Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ning Tang *Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macau Polytechnic University, Macau, China.
Menghan JiangSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhihao LeiSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Yue HanThe 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Influenza is prevalent globally, leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Vaccination remains a critical strategy for influenza prevention. Although previous studies in China have primarily focused on influenza vaccination among children, limited research has addressed the key determinants and equity issues concerning adult influenza vaccination.The purpose of this study was to investigate the key factors influencing influenza vaccination and its equity among Chinese adults. Methods: The study uses data from the 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) (N = 2695).Initially, differences in influenza vaccination among adults with various baseline characteristics were analyzed using the chi-square test. Subsequently, the importance of influencing factors was assessed through a random forest model, with LASSO used for variable selection. Following this, weighted logistic regression analysis was applied to quantify the significant influencing factors. Finally, the concentration index was employed to identify and determine the contribution of important variables to influenza vaccination. Results: The influenza vaccination rate among Chinese adults is low (6.75%). Key factors identified as influencing adult vaccination include government trust, physician trust, income, aging concerns, health insurance, age, education, and health status. These factors not only have independent effects but also interact to influence vaccination behavior. Regarding individual effects, government trust, physician trust, income, and aging concerns showed positive associations with vaccination rates. Conversely, health insurance status, age, educational attainment, and health status demonstrated negative associations. Regarding the interaction terms, there were positive associations between health insurance and government trust, education and government trust, health and physician trust, government trust, as well as education level and age with the target variables. In contrast, interactions between income and health insurance, as well as income and physician trust negatively influenced vaccination rates. The concentration index for adult influenza vaccination was 0.092. There was inequity in vaccination, with the distribution of vaccinations being skewed toward higher-income individuals. Decomposition analysis further revealed that the primary contributors to vaccination inequity, in descending order of magnitude, were income (32.6%), government trust (9.1%), education (8.7%), age (8.2%), and aging concerns (2.6%). Discussion: This is the first study to leverage a large micro-survey database in China to analyze the key factors affecting adult influenza vaccination and its equity. By providing new evidence on influenza vaccination among Chinese adults, the findings may inform the optimization of adult immunization policies. To further increase influenza vaccination rates and promote equity among Chinese adults, future policy improvements could consider emphasizing the role of trust in vaccination uptake, subsidizing vaccination costs, and fully utilizing comprehensive intervention strategies to enhance adult influenza vaccination coverage and equity.

Indexed as

Health EquityInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccinesadultsequityinfluenzakey factorsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40538690
PMCPMC12176740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.