ReviewCureus2025
From Research to Practice: The Future of Cardiovascular Care.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three group randomised controlled trial on effectiveness of mobile application based performance feedback interventions on cardiovascular risk factors among Nigerian university staff.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Breaking the one-dimensional paradigm: why cardiovascular research needs a multi-systems revolution.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, necessitating continuous advancements in research and clinical practice. Research advancements have significantly transformed our understanding and management of CVDs. Recent breakthroughs in genomics, artificial intelligence (AI), wearable technology, and regenerative medicine are reshaping cardiovascular (CV) care. This review explores key innovations that bridge the gap between research and clinical application, emphasizing precision medicine, early detection, and personalized therapies. We also discuss challenges in implementation and future directions for optimizing CV outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.