Evidence mapPaperPMID 40539369Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

Assessment of Anticancer Effects of Aloe vera on 3D Liver Tumor Spheroids in a Microfluidic Platform.

Atakan Tevlek, Gunes Kibar, Barbaros Cetin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atakan TevlekDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-8642
Gunes KibarDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Micro Nano Particles (MNP) Research Group, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey.
Barbaros CetinUNAM - Institute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

The study was supported by the Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for effective anticancer therapies has increasingly focused on natural compounds like Aloe vera, renowned for its therapeutic properties. This study investigates the anticancer properties of Aloe vera on 3D liver tumor spheroids via a PDMS-based microfluidic device, providing a more physiologically realistic model compared to traditional 2D cultures. HepG2 cells were cultivated to generate 3D spheroids on-chip, thereafter subjected to different concentrations of Aloe vera and the chemotherapeutic drug Doxorubicin to evaluate cytotoxic effects. The microfluidic system, validated by COMSOL simulations, facilitated continuous perfusion and real-time assessment of cell viability over a duration of 10 days. The results indicated that Aloe vera markedly diminished cell viability by triggering apoptosis at concentrations over 12.5 mg/mL. IC50 values were determined at 72 h: 25 ± 0.10 mg/mL for Aloe vera and 5.47 ± 0.03 µg/mL for Doxorubicin in 2D cultures, but in 3D cultures, the IC50 values were 31.25 ± 0.14 mg/mL for Aloe vera and 8.33 ± 0.05 µg/mL for Doxorubicin. This study underscores the promise of Aloe vera as a natural anticancer agent and illustrates the efficacy of microfluidic platforms for enhanced drug screening and customized medicine applications.

Indexed as

AloeAntineoplastic AgentsLiver NeoplasmsPlant ExtractsSpheroids, CellularApoptosisCell SurvivalDoxorubicinHep G2 CellsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinPlant Extracts3D cell cultureAloe veraanticancer agentmicrofluidic

Identifiers

PMID40539369
PMCPMC12322640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.