Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40539390›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Deciphering Cell Type Abundance in Proteomics Data Through Graph Neural Networks.

Zhiming Dai, Yujie Song, Tuoshi Qi, Hongyu Zhang, Huiying Zhao, Zheng Wang, Yuedong Yang, Yuansong Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Deciphering Cell Type Abundance in Proteomics Data Through Graph Neural Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhiming DaiSchool of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400000, China.
Yujie SongSchool of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400000, China.
Tuoshi QiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Hongyu ZhangSchool of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400000, China.
Huiying ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Department of Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zheng WangJinfeng Laboratory, Chongqing, China.
Yuedong YangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Yuansong ZengSchool of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6470-0671

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024M763866Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024IAIS-QN020Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen University 23xkjc003National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Program 62402071Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515011907The Science and Technology Innovation Key R&D Program of Chongqing CSTB2023TIAD-STX0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in proteomics sequencing have significantly enhanced our ability to explore cell-type-specific signatures within complex tissues, providing critical insights into disease mechanisms. However, current proteomic technologies often suffer from low resolution, resulting in the mixing of multiple cell types during profiling. To address this limitation, cell-type deconvolution methods are developed to infer cellular composition from proteomic data. While most existing deconvolution methods are focused on transcriptomics, their application to proteomics is hindered by the weak correlation and divergent quantification between transcriptome and proteome data. Although a few proteomic-specific deconvolution methods are recently emerged, they still exhibit limited capability and performance, partly because they only extract shared information from individual samples while ignoring higher-order relationships between them. Here, GraphDEC is proposed, a novel graph neural network-based method for deciphering cell type proportions in proteomic profiling data. GraphDEC begins by simulating bulk samples from single-cell proteomic data to create reference data, which is then used to infer cell types in target datasets. Specifically, GraphDEC employs an autoencoder to extract low-dimensional representations from both reference and target proteomic data, enabling the construction of similarity relationships among samples. These relationships, combined with proteomic data, are processed by a graph neural network that integrates a multi-channel mechanism and a hybrid neighborhood-aware approach to learn highly effective representations. To optimize the model, GraphDEC utilizes multiple loss functions, including triplet loss, domain adaptation loss, and Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss, ensuring robust performance and mitigating batch effects. Benchmark experiments demonstrate that GraphDEC achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse synthetic proteomic datasets from different sequencing technologies and real-world spatial proteomic datasets. Furthermore, GraphDEC exhibits strong generalization capabilities, showing high efficiency when applied to cross-species proteomic data and even transcriptomics.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteomeProteomicsAlgorithmsGraph Neural NetworksHumansProteomegraph neural networksproteomics deconvolutionspatial proteomics

Identifiers

PMID40539390
PMCPMC12412507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.