Trial reportResearch in nursing & health2025
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Cerebral Palsy: Long Term Effects: A Double-Blind Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Research in nursing & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04915170 (Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Adult Patients With Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Adult Patients With Cerebral Palsy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory disease is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in adults with cerebral palsy (CP). The main objective of the study was to investigate the maintenance over time of improvements in respiratory parameters achieved with inspiratory muscle training (IMT). This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial and with allocation concealment performed on 27 institutionalized CP patients randomly distributed in two groups: "high intensity training group" (HIT) trained with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and "low intensity training group" (LIT) with 20%. Respiratory strength and pulmonary function were evaluated throughout the study. Four weeks after IMT most improvements persisted. Twelve weeks after IMT, only HIT maintained significant improvements (p = 0.001) in MIP; 24 weeks after IMT, in the HIT group, MIP was 10% higher than the initial results and pulmonary function parameters were 1% lower. In the LIT group, respiratory strength and pulmonary function were lower than at baseline. Improvements achieved with IMT are reduced over time once the treatment ends. During the first 4 weeks posttreatment, the benefits persist but from the 12th week there was a progressive loss of the improvement reaching a total loss at 24 weeks. To be most effective, a higher MIP load is suggested for respiratory treatment, which must be maintained over time and interruptions should not be longer than 4 weeks. Clinical trial registration. The study was registered in the clinical trials database of the United States National Library of Medicine (www.clinicaltrials.gov) with the number of registration NCT04915170.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.