ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
In-vitro assessment of probiotic potential of bacteria isolated from chicken gastrointestinal tract.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Broilers farming has been suffering from multiple challenges, including extensive application of antibiotics. Probiotics-supplemented feed might serve as an efficient alternative to these growth stimulants. We designed the present study to isolate bacteria from chickens' gut and analyze their probiotic characteristics. For isolation, the serial dilution method and De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar (MRS) medium were used. Isolates were characterized via biochemical and ribotyping analysis, growth study, antimicrobial and antibiotic sensitivity profiling, acid and bile salt tolerance, intestinal adhesion and cholesterol degradation assays. Four isolates were identified as Enterococcus durans strain PUPro5, Lactobacillus acidophilus strain PUPro6, Enterococcus durans strain PUPro7 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius strain PUPro8. The highest growth rate was observed in E. durans strain PUPro7 with OD
Indexed as
Identifiers
40540078What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.