ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025
How Sugar Quality and Concentration Influence Oviposition Preference in Drosophila Melanogaster.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female insects possess a complex chemosensory system that enables them to identify optimal oviposition substrates for their developing offspring. Both calorie-rich and protein-rich substrates are particularly attractive for laying eggs. We hypothesize that females detect concentrations of sweet compounds and preferentially select those concentrations that enhance larval survival. To test this, we investigated how female Drosophila melanogaster evaluate substrates with varying concentrations of sugars and amino acids, and whether these preferences correlate with larval survival. Using choice assays, we found that females preferentially deposited eggs on substrates containing 0.1 mol/L sucrose, while higher concentrations (2 mol/L) were consistently avoided-a response not attributable to differences in substrate hardness or prior feeding experience during mating. In contrast, when presented with monosaccharides, females favored intermediate concentrations: 0.5 mol/L for both glucose and fructose, with a marked overall preference for fructose even when combined with an amino acid mixture. Moreover, substrates aligning with the females' oviposition choices often supported best survival of larvae. These findings indicate that female flies assess not only the concentration but might also consider the chemical nature of sweet compounds when making oviposition decisions and they underscore a critical link between maternal site selection and larval development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.