ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2025
Transcriptomic Differences Between Immortalized Oral and Skin Keratinocytes.
Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the influence of lactoferrin on wound healing and related signaling pathways: a systematic review.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- TLR4-paxillin-Rac1 signaling mediates LPS-induced dysregulation of keratinocyte function.iScience · 2026Article
- Contrasting biological responses of gingival fibroblasts and keratinocyte to blue and violet light irradiation: implications for photobiomodulation use in the therapeutic management of periodontal disease.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Harnessing the Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles for Oral Wound Healing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Transcriptomic Differences Between Immortalized Oral and Skin Keratinocytes.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared to skin wounds, oral mucosal wounds heal quicker with less inflammation, faster re-epithelialization, and minimal scarring. Site-specific keratinocytes may be one differentiating factor. This study used immortalized skin and oral keratinocytes (HaCaT and TIGK), which maintain fidelity to their primary cell counterpart, to examine functional and transcriptional differences that might contribute to the differential wound healing at the two sites. Oral keratinocytes were found to have an enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity. To examine the transcriptomic differences, we generated an mRNA-sequencing gene expression dataset utilizing HaCaT and TIGK. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between HaCaT and TIGK at baseline and throughout in vitro healing. DEGs in HaCaT and TIGK following injury were also identified when compared to each respective cell type's unwounded gene expression levels. Gene set enrichment analyses were performed to understand the biological significance of the DEGs. Processes related to interferon (IFN) signaling were uniquely enriched in TIGK. TIGK also exhibited a faster transcriptional response to injury and differential expression of integrins and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). When grown on extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, TIGK retained its enhanced migratory capacity over HaCaT. Lastly, TIGK displayed a post-injury secretome that promoted keratinocyte migration. Our comparative analyses suggest that specific transcriptomic differences between oral and skin keratinocytes at unwounded baseline and in response to injury may underlie the distinct wound healing phenotypes observed in these two tissues. This work also provides a new resource of HaCaT and TIGK gene expression data that can be used for future analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.