ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Clinical outcomes of participants of a TB prevalence survey with an abnormal chest X-ray but no evidence of TB disease after a median follow-up of 9 months in Zambia and South Africa.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High two-month mortality in Gabonese adults with and without tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study of patients with presumed pulmonary tuberculosis.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Performance of Human and Computer-aided Evaluation of Digital Chest Radiography for Community-based Screening of Asymptomatic Tuberculosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Global status of policies and practices for systematic TB screening in high-burden countries.IJTLD open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WHO recommends computer-aided detection (CAD) in chest X-ray (CXR) for systematic screening of TB. Increased detection of individuals with high CAD score but without bacteriologically confirmed TB can be expected, requiring guidance on their clinical management. We followed participants of a TB prevalence survey (TBPS) in Zambia and South Africa with a high CAD score but no bacteriologically confirmed TB over a median time of 9 months and assessed their clinical outcomes. At the TBPS participants with TB-suggestive symptoms or a CAD score ≥40 submitted two sputum samples for Xpert-Ultra testing, and, an additional sample was collected the next day for liquid culture and Xpert-ultra testing. Participants with a CAD score ≥70 and no bacteriologically confirmed TB were eligible for follow-up. At follow-up visit participants were asked about TB symptoms and treatment, underwent a repeat CXR with CAD, and those with either TB-suggestive symptoms or a CAD score ≥70 at follow-up submitted a sputum sample for Xpert-Ultra testing. A composite "clinical" outcome was defined based on changes in CAD-score and TB-suggestive symptoms between the TBPS and the follow-up. Of the 254 eligible TBPS participants 162 (65%) completed follow-up. Most of the participants self-reported previous TB (65% 105/162), were from Zambia (79%, 128/162,) and male (70%, 97/162). Overall, 43% (70/162) participants progressed clinically/remained radiologically abnormal and 6% (10/162) developed TB between the TBPS and the follow-up, with an overall TB incidence rate of 7% per year (95% CI: 3.8-13.3). Patients with high CAD score but no bacteriological confirmation may have had a past TB or other pulmonary lesions identified in the CXR, which may need to be investigated. Also, these participants may be at risk of progressing to TB over time and could benefit from a follow-up visit and from repeated assessment of symptoms and CXR.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.