ReviewEuropean thyroid journal2025
Molecular predictive biomarker testing in advanced thyroid cancer - a European consensus.
Review in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latin American Thyroid Society expert panel consensus on anaplastic thyroid cancer.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Sex and Mortality Among Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- [New developments in endocrinology/diabetology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Iodine and Its Impact on the Immune System of Humans and Domesticated Mammals: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Where Does Liquid Biopsy Add Value in Thyroid Cancer? Biological Rationale, Technological Innovation, and Clinical Utility.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Clinical actionability of molecular testing in advanced thyroid cancer: a real-world cohort study.European thyroid journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma: current landscape and future prospects.The oncologist · 2026Review
- The actual and future role of molecular tests in thyroid pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Precision Thyroid Oncology: A Review of Multi-Omics Biomarkers and Spatiotemporal Technologies.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted therapy in thyroid cancer: molecular alterations and clinical management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Histopathological, Immunohistochemical, Molecular and Genetic Biomarkers in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As new precision oncology therapies become available in the thyroid cancer (TC) treatment landscape, appropriate and timely biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Recently published European guidelines on advanced/metastatic TC management include a special focus on biomarker testing. However, to date, there remains a need for comprehensive European guidance for standardized molecular testing strategies in TC that encompass a broad set of targetable or potentially targetable alterations, timing of testing, and patients to be tested. This expert opinion article outlines consensus testing algorithms for differentiated TC, medullary TC, and anaplastic TC from a team of endocrinologists, oncologists, molecular biologists, and pathologists to provide standardized recommendations for physicians involved in treating patients with advanced TC. In the differentiated TC algorithm, patients recommended for comprehensive testing by DNA and RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) include those whose disease has progressed on or is resistant to radioactive iodine treatment. The medullary TC algorithm recommends RET germline testing for all patients at diagnosis. For patients exhibiting high-risk clinical or pathological features and those whose disease progresses, somatic RET testing with NGS should be discussed and conducted before considering systemic treatment. As anaplastic TC is a highly aggressive disease, molecular reflex testing for BRAF mutations is recommended for all patients at diagnosis, followed by DNA and RNA NGS for those who test BRAF negative. The article also provides consensus recommendations on the use of tumor tissue for testing and on centralization of molecular testing involving multidisciplinary tumor boards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.