Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540755›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biochemistry2025

DNA Damage and Replication Stress Checkpoints.

Luke A Yates, Xiaodong Zhang, Peter M Burgers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke A YatesDNA Processing Machines Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Xiaodong ZhangDNA Processing Machines Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Peter M BurgersDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; email: burgers@wustl.edu.

Funding

MECHANISMS OF DNA REPLICATION AND MAINTENANCE IN EUKARYOTESR35GM118129 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BURGERS, PETER M · 2016 to 2025
$6.7M
Medical Research Council MR/Y001192/1NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118129Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints are key regulatory signaling cascades that arrest cell cycle progression upon DNA damage or upon DNA replication stalling and allow time for repair or correction. Failure to elicit these checkpoints can lead to genomic instability that can result in cell death or mutations, ultimately leading to diseases such as cancer. Components of the DNA damage checkpoint are attractive targets for precision medicine to treat cancers. Over the last several years, cutting-edge structural techniques have provided molecular insights into the highly coordinated checkpoint signaling that occurs in response to DNA damage or other obstacles to replication progression. This review summarizes our current mechanistic understanding of the DNA damage checkpoint in eukaryotes, with an emphasis on the sensor kinases ATM (Tel1) and ATR (Mec1), highlighting structure-function and cellular studies.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle CheckpointsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA RepairGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasmsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsATMTel1 kinaseATRMec1 kinasecell cycle checkpointsDNA metabolismreplication stresssignaling cascades

Identifiers

PMID40540755
PMCPMC12893018

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.