ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025
Examining the biological causes of eating disorders to inform treatment strategies.
Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bulimia nervosa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Nutritional state-dependent changes in subcortical limbic structures in anorexia nervosa are linked to leptin, ghrelin, and neurofilament light.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Psilocybin Treatment as an Adjunct to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders: Therapeutic Rationale & Considerations for Protocol Development.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their prevalence, eating disorders (EDs) are under-researched and often misunderstood. A recent focus of research on the biological underpinnings of EDs has helped to reframe our understanding of their origins, but there remain a lack of effective treatment options, high rates of relapse and, unfortunately, high mortality and morbidity. In this Review, we highlight the many facets of normal and pathological feeding behaviour and body weight regulation and suggest that these provide a framework with which to develop integrative methods to study, and ultimately treat, EDs. We propose that a better understanding of the biological causes of ED, and their crucial interactions with psychological and environmental factors, is necessary to progress the field. This can be achieved through a combination of preclinical and clinical investigations, which provide complementary information on these highly complex disorders. In the era of individualized medicine and with the advent of artificial intelligence tools that allow the amalgamation of multimodal data, we hope that a better understanding of the biology of EDs may hold the answer to effectively overcoming the debilitating effects of these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542183What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.