ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Global research trends on Chinese patent drugs inducing programmed cell death in cancer: a bibliometric analysis (1998-2024).
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChinese patent drugs, standardized formulations rooted in traditional Chinese medicine, have gained attention for their potential to induce programmed cell death (PCD) in cancer cells. Emerging evidence suggests that these formulations may affect multiple PCD pathways, including apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, thus offering a multifaceted approach to tumor suppression.
objectivesThis study aimed to map the global research landscape on Chinese patent drugs in cancer-related PCD, examining publication trends, principal contributors, and thematic evolutions. The analysis also sought to provide insights that could guide future investigations and clinical applications.
methodsBibliometric data were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (1998-2023), focusing on articles investigating Chinese patent drugs and PCD in oncological contexts. R-bibliometrix was used for descriptive statistics and trend analyses, while VOSviewer generated network visualizations of co-occurring keywords, collaboration patterns, and co-citation clusters.
resultsOverall publication output increased markedly, with China leading in both volume and impact. Collaboration networks revealed extensive international partnerships, underscoring global interest in standardized herbal formulations. Keyword mapping highlighted a shift from early apoptosis-centric studies to more diverse regulated cell-death pathways, indicating greater mechanistic depth and exploration of synergistic effects with conventional therapies.
conclusionChinese patent drugs are increasingly recognized as promising agents for modulating PCD in cancer cells. Ongoing work focuses on standardized manufacturing, robust clinical validation, and mechanistic elucidation. These trends position Chinese patent drugs at a pivotal juncture for advancing integrative oncology and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.