ReviewTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Therapeutic options for patients with pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease.
Review in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the Complexity of PH-ILD: From Molecular Mechanisms to Integrated Clinical Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond scarring: a next-generation vision for pulmonary fibrosis management.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertensive diseases have been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) into five groups based on the pathophysiology and characteristics of each disease state. Several targeted therapeutic agents have been developed that combat the vascular remodeling in WHO Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension, however, the search for treatment solutions in other WHO Groups has been less fruitful. In this review, we focus on therapeutic options for patients with pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Investigations of targeted WHO Group 1 PAH therapies have largely failed to improve functional capacity, hemodynamics, oxygenation, quality of life, or survival in PH-ILD. In contrast, inhaled treprostinil was shown effective in the INCREASE Trial, a placebo-controlled study in which patients with PH-ILD treated with inhaled treprostinil demonstrated a 31-meter placebo-corrected improvement in the primary endpoint, 6-minute walk distance. Treatment with inhaled treprostinil was also associated with improvement in time to clinical worsening, fewer exacerbations of underlying lung disease, decrease in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic protein (NT-proBNP) levels, and improvement in forced vital capacity compared to placebo. In this review, we also elaborate on the current understanding of the pathobiology leading to PH-ILD with emphasis on the role of newer signaling pathways and mediators of vascular biology that may expand treatment options. Strategy and innovations for early detection and diagnosis are highlighted while underscoring the importance of early detection and diagnosis. A holistic and collaborative approach to the treatment of PH-ILD is outlined including a variety of adjunctive measures and the consideration of patient-reported outcome data in order to improve disease management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.