ReviewSkeletal radiology2025
Musculoskeletal manifestations of sickle cell disease: an imaging perspective.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-TyphoidalInfectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Beyond Chordoma: A Comprehensive Review of Sacral Lesions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a spectrum of inherited blood disorders, leading to propensity to sickling disruption of red blood cells. Musculoskeletal complications are a common cause of acute and chronic morbidities, related to the main pathophysiological processes: (i) hemolysis and anemia, resulting in marrow hyperplasia and extramedullary hematopoiesis; and (ii) vaso-occlusion, leading to osteonecrosis/bone infarction, myonecrosis, and infection (osteomyelitis and septic arthritis). Knowing the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations is essential for imaging interpretation, but differentiation between acute osteomyelitis and bone infarction remains a clinical and imaging challenge, therefore requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Large subperiosteal fluid collections (≥ 4 mm in depth), in conjunction with elevated inflammatory markers and white blood counts, are more suggestive of osteomyelitis rather than isolated bone infarction. The unenhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed sequence on MR images was also proposed to aid in this differentiation, but so far with controversial results. Future perspectives of MR imaging include the DIXON technique, which has shown promising results as a biomarker of morbidity of SCD, through evaluation of fat fraction (FF) of bone marrow in a single acquisition and noninvasive way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542898What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.