Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544201›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Molecular and biological approach to ischemia/reperfusion in diabetes conditions.

Melis Kilic, Zekai Halici

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melis KilicDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7437-7890
Zekai HaliciDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240, Turkey. hzekai@atauni.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-6059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemia results from an inadequate supply of oxygen and nutrients to tissues, often due to obstruction of arterial blood flow. Reperfusion refers to the restoration of blood flow to tissues after the obstruction is removed. Severe clinical conditions such as myocardial infarction, cerebral ischemia, stroke, and hemorrhagic shock can lead to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. During this process, oxidative stress triggers various biological events, including inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), and apoptosis, all of which impair critical physiological functions. The presence of hyperglycemia exacerbates these pathophysiological processes, further intensifying I/R injury. Hyperglycemia contributes to increased oxidative stress, activation of inflammatory pathways, mitochondrial dysfunction, and elevated ERS. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying I/R injury, with a particular emphasis on the role of hyperglycemia. Although numerous clinical, basic, in vivo, and in vitro studies have been conducted on this topic, further research is necessary to fully understand how hyperglycemia influences I/R injury.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusReperfusion InjuryAnimalsApoptosisEndoplasmic Reticulum StressHumansHyperglycemiaInflammationMitochondriaOxidative StressHyperglicemiaInflammationIschemia/reperfusion (I/R) injuryOxidative stress

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.