ArticleGut pathogens2025
Bloodstream infection by Lactobacillus rhamnosus in a haematology patient: why metagenomics can make the difference.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From gene detection to resistome ecology: targeted hybrid capture in AMR surveillance.mSphere · 2026Article
- Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Excluding the Nosocomial Origin of a Case of Legionnaires' Disease Integrating Environmental Surveillance and Clinical Diagnosis.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Therapeutic ecology of the fiber-microbiota-barrier axis in leukemia: resilience, immune recovery and pharmacomicrobiomics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Harnessing Probiotics to Combat Candidiasis: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Future Directions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Crossing the Barrier:Microorganisms · 2025Review
- The invasive GAS puzzle in Italy: genomic insights from a hospital cohort in a fragmented surveillance landscape.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBloodstream infections (BSIs) pose a persistent threat to hospitalized patients, particularly those who are immunocompromised and susceptible to infections caused by anaerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria. Alterations in gut microbiota composition can predispose individuals to intestinal domination by one or more pathobionts, increasing the risk of bacterial translocation into the bloodstream and subsequent bacteremia. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 20-year-old female with multiple relapsed/refractory Philadelphia-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, initially referred to our hematology center for CAR-T cell therapy. The patient ultimately underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which was complicated by infections, moderate-to-severe graft-versus-host disease, hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, and transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, all contributing to a fatal outcome. Blood cultures obtained in the final week before the patient succumbed to multi-organ toxicity grew Lactobacillus rhamnosus. A fecal sample collected concurrently for intestinal microbiota characterization revealed a marked predominance of Bacillota (98.5%), with Lacticaseibacillus dominating at 47.9%, followed by Pediococcus (18.59%) and Staphylococcus (3.5%) at the genus level. We performed genomic comparison between the L. rhamnosus isolated from blood cultures and the best-matched strain detected in the intestinal microbiota.
conclusionsWe report the isolation of L. rhamnosus from blood cultures in a patient post hematopoietic cell transplantation, with genomic similarity to a gut-dominant L. rhamnosus strain. This case highlights the potential link between intestinal domination and subsequent bloodstream infection, supporting the value of gut microbiota profiling as an adjunctive tool for monitoring high-risk patients, such as hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.