ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
Assessing physical function in transplantation and CAR-T recipients: expert recommendations from the survivorship, aging and biobehavioral special interest groups of ASTCT.
Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The past few decades have witnessed significant advancements in stem cell transplantation and cell therapy (TCT). This has allowed their expanded use in older patients and those with comorbidities with favorable outcomes. However, these procedures carry significant risks, such as graft-versus-host disease, infection, cytokine release syndrome, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity. Therefore, physical function assessment is crucial to assess patient fitness and potential optimization before and after TCT. The existence of diverse assessment tools makes implementation, comparison, and sharing knowledge among centers difficult. This paper proposes a tiered approach aiming to harmonize physical assessment in the TCT. This allows healthcare facilities to prioritize recommended assessments based on their current capabilities and resources. TCT patients should receive comprehensive physical assessments pre- and post-TCT using a combination of both patient-reported and objective measures. For patient-reported measures, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System should be considered. For objective measures, we recommend considering a physical performance assessment (eg, gait speed) or muscle strength assessment (eg, hand grip), if feasible. Albumin and C reactive protein are also informative in predicting the risk of nonrelapse mortality. Other composite tools, questionnaire libraries, biomarkers, imaging, and wearables can be added according to research and clinical needs. A care workflow needs to be in place in case any impairment is found during the evaluation with goals of increasing physiologic reserve and mitigating stressors. This tiered approach will increase awareness and adoption of these tools and hence improve patient care, facilitate data sharing, and enhance collaboration in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.