Evidence mapPaperPMID 40545546Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Enablers and barriers to physical activity among older adults of low socio-economic status: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

Olivia S Malkowski, Jessica Harvey, Nick P Townsend, Mark J Kelson, Charlie E M Foster, Max J Western

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivia S MalkowskiCentre for Motivation and Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jessica HarveyCentre for Motivation and Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Nick P TownsendCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mark J KelsonInstitute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Charlie E M FosterCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Max J WesternCentre for Motivation and Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK. M.J.Western@bath.ac.uk.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/P000630/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the factors influencing physical activity in older adults, and whether they vary according to socio-economic status (SES), could help to inform interventions that are effective in reducing inequalities and improving the quality of life of an ageing population. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the qualitative evidence on the modifiable enablers of, and barriers to, physical activity based on low-SES older adults' perspectives in the United Kingdom (UK). A secondary aim was to identify and summarise differences in physical activity enablers and barriers between older adults of low and high SES.

methodsWe searched five electronic databases from inception to December 2023 for studies conducted among UK-based, community-dwelling older adults aged 60+ years including qualitative methods, with results reported by SES. We excluded hospitalised or institutionalised participants. Risk of bias was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and framework synthesis was applied using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) model.

resultsThirty studies were included in the review, of which five specifically examined inequalities in physical activity enablers and barriers. Low-SES older adults' physical capability was influenced by fitness, mobility, and general health, while their psychological capability was shaped by knowledge and behavioural regulation. Physical opportunity was characterised by safety, pedestrian infrastructure, access to physical activity opportunities and daily destinations, environmental quality, and aesthetics. Themes under social opportunity encompassed social support, social norms, social engagement, and dog ownership. Physical activity was motivated by reflective processes, such as outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, and attitudes, as well as automatic processes, including habits, lack of time, and enjoyment. Few studies investigated differences between participants of low and high SES, with those that did predominantly pointing to disparities in the physical or built environment.

conclusionsThis meta-synthesis of qualitative literature identified a wide range of interacting factors influencing physical activity across socio-ecological and COM-B domains, underscoring whole-system interventions as a potential approach to stimulate meaningful and sustained change. Future research could report results by SES to enhance our understanding of inequalities and ensure that low-SES older adults are represented in the development and evaluation of interventions targeting improvements in physical activity.

Indexed as

ExerciseSocial ClassAgedFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSocioeconomic FactorsUnited KingdomHealth inequalitiesOlder adultsPhysical activityQualitative researchSocio-economic statusSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40545546
PMCPMC12183869

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.