Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40545620›Full record

ReviewIntestinal research2025

Evolution of inflammatory bowel disease in Korea: a 60-year perspective on clinical and research development.

Suk-Kyun Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intestinal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Suk-Kyun YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was once considered rare in Korea, with the first reported case documented in 1961. Since then, its incidence and prevalence have increased markedly, accompanied by significant progress in clinical care and research. This narrative review traces the historical evolution of IBD in Korea, dividing the timeline into 4 periods: 1960-1979, 1980-1999, 2000-2019, and 2020-2039. For each period, major developments in the research environment and trends, diagnostic process, patient population and characteristics, and treatment are outlined. Over the past 6 decades, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in Korea have advanced markedly, transitioning from limited diagnostic capacity and symptom-based management to practices that align with global standards. Notably, Korean patients with IBD exhibit distinctive clinical features compared with Western counterparts, including a markedly higher proportion of proctitis and a lower long-term risk of colectomy in ulcerative colitis, and a substantially higher prevalence of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease, highlighting the need for population- specific strategies to advance personalized medicine. In parallel, the research landscape has evolved through multicenter collaborations, expanded research capacity, and growing international engagement, positioning Korea as an increasingly active contributor to the global IBD research community. Looking ahead, the future of IBD research in Korea is expected to be shaped by innovation-driven research, including advances in artificial intelligence, large-scale data integration, and deeper international collaboration. By tracing the clinical and research trajectory of IBD in Korea, this review offers insight into how the country has adapted to global trends and is preparing to meet future challenges.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyHistoryInflammatory bowel diseaseKorea

Identifiers

PMID40545620
PMCPMC12332290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.