Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546134›Full record

ReviewPrimary health care research & development2025

Practical strategies for achieving system change in the US: lessons and insights from the CONQUEST quality improvement programme.

Alexander Evans, Jill VanWyk, Margee Kerr, Amy Couper, Wilson D Pace, Yasir Tarabichi, Rachel Pullen, Michael Pollack, M Bradley Drummond, Jill Ohar and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Primary health care research & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Alexander EvansObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Jill VanWykDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4671-7165
Margee KerrObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Amy CouperObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3892-3113
Wilson D PaceDARTNet Institute, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-5471
Yasir TarabichiPulmonologist at Metro Health Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-5654
Rachel PullenObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-9845
Michael PollackBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-3059
M Bradley DrummondDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-4610
Jill OharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2757-6806
Catherine MeldrumPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
MeiLan K HanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alan KaplanFamily Physician Airways Group of Canada, Stouffville, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8795-5528
Tonya WindersGlobal Allergy & Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-6438
Juan WisniveskyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Barry MakeDepartment of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-8745
Alex FedermanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Victoria CarterOptimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, UK.
Katie LangObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Douglas MapelUniversity of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5208-4363
Nicola A HananiaSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and Director of the Airways Clinical Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Daiana StolzClinic of Respiratory Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Fernando J MartinezUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School/UMassMemorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-3182
David PriceObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-9992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement programmes (QIPs) are designed to enhance patient outcomes by systematically introducing evidence-based clinical practices. The CONQUEST QIP focuses on improving the identification and management of patients with COPD in primary care. The process of developing CONQUEST, recruiting, preparing systems for participation, and implementing the QIP across three integrated healthcare systems (IHSs) is examined to identify and share lessons learned. APPROACH AND DEVELOPMENT: This review is organized into three stages: 1) development, 2) preparing IHSs for implementation, and 3) implementation. In each stage, key steps are described with the lessons learned and how they can inform others interested in developing QIPs designed to improve the care of patients with chronic conditions in primary care.Stage 1 was establishing and working with steering committees to develop the QIP Quality Standards, define the target patient population, assess current management practices, and create a global operational protocol. Additionally, potential IHSs were assessed for feasibility of QIP integration into primary care practices. Factors assessed included a review of technological infrastructure, QI experience, and capacity for effective implementation.Stage 2 was preparation for implementation. Key was enlisting clinical champions to advocate for the QIP, secure participation in primary care, and establish effective communication channels. Preparation for implementation required obtaining IHS approvals, ensuring Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, and devising operational strategies for patient outreach and clinical decision support delivery.Stage 3 was developing three IHS implementation models. With insight into the local context from local clinicians, implementation models were adapted to work with the resources and capacity of the IHSs while ensuring the delivery of essential elements of the programme.

conclusionDeveloping and launching a QIP programme across primary care practices requires extensive groundwork, preparation, and committed local champions to assist in building an adaptable environment that encourages open communication and is receptive to feedback.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality ImprovementHumansProgram DevelopmentUnited StatesCOPDimplementationintegrated health care primary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40546134
PMCPMC12188133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.