ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Call to Action: Empowering Pharmacists in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Management.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of stunting among Indonesian children: a cross-sectional study on the role of child, maternal, and vaccination factors.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Role of Clozapine in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Narrative Synthesis of Clinical, Economic, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a major global health threat, and while advancements in drug therapies have been made, the role of pharmacists in improving patient outcomes has not been fully optimized. This review aims to describe the types, resistance mechanisms, and management strategies of DR-TB, with a focus on discussing the critical role of pharmacists in optimizing treatment outcomes for DR-TB patients. A narrative review approach was adopted to provide an updated and evidence-based perspective. Additionally, manual review of reference lists from the retrieved articles was performed to identify additional relevant studies. The review identifies types of DR-TB, including mono-, poly-, rifampicin-, multi-, pre-extensively, and extensively-drug resistance. Resistance mechanisms are outlined, highlighting mutations in key genes, such as those involved in rifampicin and isoniazid (INH) resistance, which compromise treatment efficacy. The treatment regimens for DR-TB include the INH-R regimen, Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid (with or without Moxifloxacin) (BPaL(M) regimen, shorter oral regimen, and longer oral regimen, each tailored to the specific resistance pattern and patient condition. The challenges in managing DR-TB include complex treatment regimens and side effects, social barriers such as stigma and adherence issues, and system-related obstacles like limited resources and healthcare infrastructure. The review underscores pharmacists' vital yet underutilized role in addressing challenges. Pharmacists' contributions include patient counseling to improve adherence, and optimizing regimens for vulnerable populations and therapeutic drug monitoring. Addressing DR-TB requires a multifaceted approach, with pharmacists playing a critical role in its management. Their contributions are key to improving patient outcomes and overcoming the challenges associated with DR-TB management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.