Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546707›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Emerging tick-borne diseases in mainland China over the past decade: a systematic review and mapping analysis.

Ya-Fei Wu, Ming-Zhu Zhang, Xiao-Ling Su, Yi-Fei Wang, Li-Feng Du, Xiao-Ming Cui, Wenqiang Shi, Dai-Yun Zhu, Lin Zhao, Luo-Yuan Xia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ya-Fei WuNational Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ming-Zhu ZhangInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Xiao-Ling SuState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi-Fei WangInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Li-Feng DuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Ming CuiState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenqiang ShiState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dai-Yun ZhuState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhaoInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Luo-Yuan XiaState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Na JiaState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jia-Fu JiangState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li-Li RenNational Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wu-Chun CaoState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging tick-borne infectious diseases have become increasingly prevalent worldwide. In a previous review, we summarized tick-borne infections in mainland China from 1980 to May, 2015. Here we conducted systematic review and mapping analysis of emerging tick-borne diseases over the past decade. Methods: We searched multiple sources for publications regarding tick-borne diseases in mainland China from June, 2015 to January, 2025. Subsequently, we collected data on tick infections of related pathogens from secondary literature review, GenBank, and our field survey, without time limitation. The clinical manifestations of each kind of tick-borne diseases were summarized. The thematic maps showing geographical distribution of emerging tick-borne diseases and related tick infections were produced by ArcGIS. Findings: Over the past decade, 28 emerging tick-borne diseases have been identified in mainland China, including 11 viral diseases, ten rickettsiosis, one anaplasmosis, one ehrlichiosis, two spirochetal diseases, and three protozoan diseases. These emerged diseases, caused by diverse pathogens, exhibit distinct geographic distribution patterns. Clinically, they are primarily characterized by febrile and non-specific symptoms, underscoring the importance of pathogen-specific diagnostic methods for accurate diagnosis. The tick-borne pathogens responsible for these emerging diseases were identified in 40 tick species and more widely distributed across China, implying cases of the emerging tick-borne diseases underdiagnosed. Interpretation: Emerging tick-borne diseases have become an unprecedented public health threat in mainland China. Increased awareness and enhanced surveillance are required to understand the burden of tick-borne diseases in China and countries where tick vectors are present. Funding: National Key Research and Development Program of China.

Indexed as

ChinaEmerging tick-borne diseasesGeographic distributionPublic health threatTicks

Identifiers

PMID40546707
PMCPMC12182379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.