Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40546969›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Distinct functions of PAXX and MRI during chromosomal end joining.

Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre, Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado, Xiaoli Ping, Ruby Chen, Jeremy M Stark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Metztli Cisneros-AguirreDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Felicia Wednesday LopezcoloradoDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Xiaoli PingDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Ruby ChenDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Jeremy M StarkDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI John Charles Williams · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Elucidating the role of DNAPKcs in chromosomal break end joining and clastogen resistanceR01CA256989 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI STARK, JEREMY MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key step of canonical-nonhomologous end joining is synapsis of DNA double-strand break (DSB) ends, which appears to be mediated by both the DNA-PKcs dimer and XLF homodimer. We have examined this process by monitoring end joining (EJ) of blunt Cas9 DSBs, focusing on the Ku-binding factors PAXX and MRI. We found that PAXX and/or MRI are dispensable for such EJ. However, PAXX becomes important for blunt DSB EJ with disruption of either DNA-PKcs or XLF, whereas MRI becomes important only with XLF disruption. In contrast, while DNA-PKcs also suppresses short deletion mutations with microhomology, this effect is not magnified with PAXX loss. Finally, XLF loss causes an increase in larger deletions compared to DNA-PKcs inhibition, which is magnified with loss of MRI. We suggest that PAXX promotes DSB end synapsis in a manner that is partially redundant with DNA-PKcs and XLF, whereas MRI is a backup factor for XLF-mediated EJ.

Indexed as

Chromosome organizationMolecular interaction

Identifiers

PMID40546969
PMCPMC12179622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.