ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025
Simplified above-knee amputation with short operation time and minimal blood loss for ultra-high-risk patients under nerve block and local anesthesia.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Above-knee amputation (AKA) is not suitable for certain ultra-high-risk patients owing to its surgical invasiveness and accompanying anesthesia. We developed a simple technique for AKA under nerve block and local anesthesia, which is quick and associated with little blood loss compared with conventional AKA. We report our experience with this procedure. Methods: The affected extremity was provided analgesia with a combination of nerve block (femoral and sciatic nerve block) and local anesthesia of a low concentration. Our amputation method comprises two key stages: an initial knee disarticulation and a subsequent supracondylar osteotomy. The muscles were cut at the tendon, the artery was ligated at the popliteal fossa, and subperiosteal dissection for amputation of the femoral condyle was minimized. The wound was closed roughly without osteomyodesis. We included 12 consecutive patients on whom the procedure was performed (7 with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and 5 with acute limb ischemia) while they were taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. All the patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of class III or higher (class III: severe systemic disease with substantive functional limitations [n = 6]; class IV: severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life [n = 6]). Results: All the surgeries were successfully completed. The mean ± standard deviation operation time was 36.0 ± 8.4 minutes, and blood loss was 52.1 ± 37.5 mL. Minor perioperative wound complications occurred in only two cases. The patients' activities of daily living after the operation were the same as before surgery in each case. Conclusions: The presented method is a potential treatment for severe lower limb necrosis in ultra-high-risk patients for whom traditional AKA is impossible owing to intolerance for general anesthesia and invasive surgery. However, the long-term results are as yet unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.