Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547228›Full record

ArticleJournal of open source software2025

PDF Entity Annotation Tool (PEAT).

Christopher G Stahl, Kristan J Markey, Brian C Jewell, Dahnish Shams, Michele M Taylor, A Amina Wilkins, Sean Watford, Andy Shapiro, Michelle Angrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of open source software, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher G StahlOak Ridge National Laboratory, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-1555
Kristan J MarkeyOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-2969
Brian C JewellOak Ridge National Laboratory, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-6523
Dahnish ShamsOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-0859
Michele M TaylorOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-0499
A Amina WilkinsOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0001-9292-833X
Sean WatfordOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0003-0888-5029
Andy ShapiroOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-8092
Michelle AngrishOffice of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-4806

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While different text mining approaches - including the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other machine based methods - continue to expand at a rapid pace, the tools used by researchers to create the labeled datasets required for training, modeling, and evaluation remain rudimentary. Labeled datasets contain the target attributes the machine is going to learn; for example, training an algorithm to delineate between images of a car or truck would generally require a set of images with a quantitative description of the underlying features of each vehicle type. Development of labeled textual data that can be used to build natural language machine learning models for scientific literature is not currently integrated into existing manual workflows used by domain experts. Published literature is rich with important information, such as different types of embedded text, plots, and tables that can all be used as inputs to train ML/natural language processing (NLP) models, when extracted and prepared in machine readable formats. Currently, both normalized data extraction of use to domain experts and extraction to support development of ML/NLP models are labor intensive and cumbersome manual processes. Automatic extraction of data and information from formats such as PDFs that are optimized for layout and human readability, not machine readability. The PDF (Portable Document Format) Entity Annotation Tool (PEAT) was developed with the goal of allowing users to annotate publications within their current print format, while also allowing those annotations to be captured in a machine-readable format. One of the main issues with traditional annotation tools is that they require transforming the PDF into plain text to facilitate the annotation process. While doing so lessens the technical challenges of annotating data, the user loses all structure and provenance that was inherent in the underlying PDF. Also, textual data extraction from PDFs can be an error prone process. Challenges include identifying sequential blocks of text and a multitude of document formats (multiple columns, font encodings, etc.). As a result of these challenges, using existing tools for development of NLP/ML models directly from PDFs is difficult because the generated outputs are not interoperable. We created a system that allows annotations to be completed on the original PDF document structure, with no plain text extraction. The result is an application that allows for easier and more accurate annotations. In addition, by including a feature that grants the user the ability to easily create a schema, we have developed a system that can be used to annotate text for different domain-centric schemas of relevance to subject matter experts. Different knowledge domains require distinct schemas and annotation tags to support machine learning.

Identifiers

PMID40547228
PMCPMC12180754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.