ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
An explainable unsupervised learning approach for anomaly detection on corneal
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Detection : Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Diseases Detection.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Our method consists of three submodules: an EfficientNet network, a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Network, and a Transformer Network. A total of 7,063 IVCM images (95 eyes) were included for analysis. The model was trained exclusively on normal IVCM images to capture and differentiate structural variations across four distinct corneal layers: epithelium, sub-basal nerve plexus, stroma, and endothelium. During inference, anomaly scores were computed to distinguish pathological from normal images. The model's performance was evaluated on both internal and external datasets, and comparative analyses were conducted against existing anomaly detection methods, including generative adversarial networks (AnoGAN), generate to detect anomaly model (G2D), and discriminatively trained reconstruction anomaly embedding model (DRAEM). Additionally, explainable anomaly maps were generated to enhance the interpretability of model decisions. Results: The proposed method achieved an the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.933 on internal validation and 0.917 on an external test dataset, outperforming AnoGAN, G2D, and DRAEM in both accuracy and generalizability. The model effectively distinguished normal and pathological images, demonstrating statistically significant differences in anomaly scores (p < 0.001). Furthermore, visualization results indicated that the detected anomalous regions corresponded to morphological deviations, highlighting potential imaging biomarkers for corneal diseases. Conclusion: This study presents an efficient and interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection model for IVCM images, effectively identifying corneal abnormalities without requiring labeled pathological samples. The proposed method enhances screening efficiency, reduces annotation costs, and holds great potential for scalable intelligent diagnosis of corneal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.