Evidence mapPaperPMID 40547296Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

An explainable unsupervised learning approach for anomaly detection on corneal

Ningning Tang, Qi Chen, Yunyu Meng, Daizai Lei, Li Jiang, Yikun Qin, Xiaojia Huang, Fen Tang, Shanshan Huang, Qianqian Lan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ningning Tang *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Qi Chen *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Yunyu Meng *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Daizai Lei *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Li Jiang *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Yikun QinInformation and Technology Department, Guangxi Beibu Gulf Bank Co., Ltd., Nanning, China.
Xiaojia HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Fen TangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Shanshan HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Qianqian LanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Qi ChenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Lijie HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Rushi LanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Image and Graphic Intelligent Processing, School of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Xipeng PanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Image and Graphic Intelligent Processing, School of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Huadeng WangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Image and Graphic Intelligent Processing, School of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Fan XuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Wenjing HeGuangxi Key Laboratory of Eye Health and Guangxi Health Commission Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Related Systemic Diseases Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology and Research Center of Ophthalmology, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and Department of Ophthalmology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Our method consists of three submodules: an EfficientNet network, a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Network, and a Transformer Network. A total of 7,063 IVCM images (95 eyes) were included for analysis. The model was trained exclusively on normal IVCM images to capture and differentiate structural variations across four distinct corneal layers: epithelium, sub-basal nerve plexus, stroma, and endothelium. During inference, anomaly scores were computed to distinguish pathological from normal images. The model's performance was evaluated on both internal and external datasets, and comparative analyses were conducted against existing anomaly detection methods, including generative adversarial networks (AnoGAN), generate to detect anomaly model (G2D), and discriminatively trained reconstruction anomaly embedding model (DRAEM). Additionally, explainable anomaly maps were generated to enhance the interpretability of model decisions. Results: The proposed method achieved an the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.933 on internal validation and 0.917 on an external test dataset, outperforming AnoGAN, G2D, and DRAEM in both accuracy and generalizability. The model effectively distinguished normal and pathological images, demonstrating statistically significant differences in anomaly scores (p < 0.001). Furthermore, visualization results indicated that the detected anomalous regions corresponded to morphological deviations, highlighting potential imaging biomarkers for corneal diseases. Conclusion: This study presents an efficient and interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection model for IVCM images, effectively identifying corneal abnormalities without requiring labeled pathological samples. The proposed method enhances screening efficiency, reduces annotation costs, and holds great potential for scalable intelligent diagnosis of corneal diseases.

Indexed as

corneal disease screeningdeep learning (DL)explainable artificial intelligencein vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)unsupervised anomaly detection

Identifiers

PMID40547296
PMCPMC12179219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.