Evidence mapPaperPMID 40547449Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2025

Exploring Providers' Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences on the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist (ERA) + Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5i).

Nicholas A Kolaitis, Martha Kingman, Melisa Wilson, Gabriela Gomez Rendon, David Lopez, Carly J Paoli, Mohammad Rahman, Ashley Martin, November McGarvey, Abraham Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas A KolaitisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-959X
Martha KingmanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-2066
Melisa WilsonAdvanced Lung Disease, AdventHealth Medical Group Orlando Florida USA.
Gabriela Gomez RendonActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. Titusville New Jersey USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1303-5201
David LopezActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. Titusville New Jersey USA.
Carly J PaoliJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville New Jersey USA.
Mohammad RahmanActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. Titusville New Jersey USA.
Ashley MartinBluePath Solutions Los Angeles California USA.
November McGarveyBluePath Solutions Los Angeles California USA.
Abraham LeeBluePath Solutions Los Angeles California USA.
Lana Melendres-GrovesDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to understand healthcare providers' (HCPs) decision to adopt double combination therapy with ERA + PDE5i for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and to explore whether a single tablet combination therapy (STCT) might increase adoption practices. 195 US HCPs completed a survey evaluating their PAH treatment preferences. HCPs' willingness to use double combination ERA + PDE5i was assessed using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The sample predominantly included physicians (73.3%) from centers of excellence (63.1%), with a mean of 117.4 PAH patients treated in the past year. Key factors influencing ERA + PDE5i adoption in the DCE were the patient's current treatment (17.9), PAH etiology (16.2), existing comorbidities (14.1), and history of side effects (12.7), with higher scores indicating stronger preference. HCPs were more likely to select ERA + PDE5i for patients currently on PDE5i monotherapy, with idiopathic PAH, and without comorbidities or a history of side effects. Regarding STCT, most HCPs reported that it would allow them to initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner (76.4%) and improve patient compliance (82.6%). However, concerns regarding cost/insurance issues (63.6%) and a history of side effects (50.8%) were identified as limitations to adopting STCT. Patients' current therapy, the cause of PAH, comorbidities, and side effects are key factors influencing whether US providers are willing to treat them with ERA + PDE5i. Providers perceive that STCT may help HCPs initiate ERA + PDE5i sooner, improve compliance, and simplify initiation of upfront double therapy and delivery of triple therapy. Addressing cost and insurance barriers will be critical to realizing these potential benefits.

Indexed as

combination therapyERAPDE5ipulmonary arterial hypertensiontreatment preferences

Identifiers

PMID40547449
PMCPMC12182709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.