ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Excessive fat intake results in lipid metabolic disorders accompanied by inflammation and other complications. However, the effectiveness of drug interventions for metabolic disorders is not ideal, owing to their inherent limitations. Here, we introduce the probiotic Method: C57BL/6J mice were fed a 60% kcal high-fat diet (HFD) for eight weeks to induce obesity, and then dipro-O intervention was administered for nine weeks. Blood glucose, serum cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels were assessed, and liver sections were processed to evaluate fat accumulation.Intestinal barrier related gene and pro-inflammatory gene in colon were detected to analyze the ability of dipro-O in intestinal homeostasis remodeling and 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to assess the changes in intestinal microbial composition. Result: After eight weeks of obesity induction, probiotic interventions were initiated and lasted for 9 weeks. Compared to the HFD-PBS group, mice in the HFD-dipro-O group gained less body weight and showed a statistically significant improvement in blood glucose control. Similarly, serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly reduced, while serum HDL was elevated, and liver sections showed that dipro-O intervention decreased fat accumulation and injury levels in the liver. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that changes in the gut microbiota inhibited bacterial invasion of epithelial cells. Conclusion: Dipro-O effectively reduced HFD-induced obesity by decreasing body weight gain, serum lipid marker levels, and liver fat accumulation. QPCR and 16S rRNA sequencing data indicated that dipro-O intervention promoted intestinal homeostasis maintenance. Taken together, these findings indicate that dipro-O has the potential to intervene in lipid disorders as an alternative to drug therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.