ArticleACS omega2025
A Fully In Silico Protocol to Understand Olfactory Receptor-Odorant Interactions.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microbial volatile organic compounds and olfactory receptors in wound malodor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Low rank adaptation of chemical foundation models generates effective odorant representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Extra-nasal odorant receptors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- A Structure-Based Approach for Predicting Odor Similarity of Molecules via Docking Simulations with Human Olfactory Receptors.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding olfactory receptor (OR)-odorant interaction is crucial for unraveling the molecular intricacies of smell, a sense that is essential for health and survival and has potential therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, the absence of comprehensive experimental data concerning ORs has significantly impeded the understanding of the structural dimensions of olfaction, thereby necessitating innovative approaches to elucidate the structural intricacies of ORs. In this study, we developed an in silico protocol to predict OR structures and study relevant odorant interactions using the OR51E2-propionate complex as a reference. We also developed a hybrid homology modeling strategy leveraging homologous Alphafold structures. This approach resulted in structures with better stability than Alphafold predicted models, as validated through molecular dynamics simulations. Our pipeline accurately replicated experimental findings for OR51E2 and was extended to three homologous ORs: OR51E1, OR51D1, and OR51G2. We used a total of 217 molecules from the M2OR database and key food odorants and applied K-nearest neighbor clustering, selecting a total of 78 representative molecules based on their proximity to cluster centroids for molecular docking studies. Our computational pipeline successfully verified over 25 previously established odorant-OR relationships, including the identification of potential interactions between OR51G2 and molecules such as trans-2-nonenal and acetyl glutamic acid. This framework provides an efficient method for predicting and characterizing potential OR-odorant pairs, streamlining the discovery process prior to experimental confirmation and advancing our understanding of OR binding mechanisms.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.