ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Access to primary health care and changes in quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to reveal the barriers to accessing primary care among diabetic patients, and the changes in their quality of life and self-management during the COVID-19 epidemic. Setting and Design: We conducted cross-sectional semi-structured qualitative research with 15 people diagnosed 4 years ago at least with type 2 diabetes in August 2022. The average age of participants was 62.3 years, 66.6% were male and 33.3% were female. A criterion sampling method was used. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed in thematic analysis. Transcripts were coded and grouped, then themes and sub-themes were formed. Results: We have identified 8 themes and 10 subthemes. The main themes were as follows: Communication with the GP, access to GP referral, fear of the epidemic, lack of personal meetings, worry about missing treatments, changes in physical activity, obstacles in blood sugar measurement, and changes in blood sugar measurement habits. All the patients communicated only by phone or messenger with the GP, nurse, or assistant during the epidemic. Patients contacted the GP only to have their medication prescribed. Some respondents thought it necessary to have face-to-face consultations. Some respondents were initially worried about the impact of the epidemic and lockdown on their lives and illness. The physical activity of the patients mainly did not change during the lockdown. While some diabetic patients said that they had measured their blood glucose more frequently at the beginning of the epidemic, some respondents irregularly measured their blood glucose since the first wave. Conclusion: General practitioners should provide more attention and regular follow-ups for those diabetic patients who changed their lifestyle and self-management during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent development of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.