ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Brucellosis in cattle and buffalo in southern Italian provinces: trends in presence of territory-specific One Health measures.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Reactive to Predictive One Health: AI-Enabled Frameworks for Integrated Zoonotic Surveillance and Governance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of bacterial and hemoparasitic diseases in the water buffalo.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Evaluation of brucellosis eradication strategies in water buffalo in a key dairy production area of southern Italy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- From Global to Local: A Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression Analysis of Bovine Brucellosis Risk Factors.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Open Data Are Urgently Needed for One Health-Based Investigations: The Example of the 2024International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: The study examines brucellosis outbreaks occurring between 2019 and 2023 in these territories, focusing on livestock that play a key role in the milk value chain, an essential pillar for economic sustainability, environmental protection and cultural heritage preservation. Since brucellosis is a WOAH Listed Disease subject to mandatory notification, we analyzed data registered in Italian, European Union and International portals concerning these notifications. Furthermore, we correlated these data to the national and regional rules adopted in order to tackle bovine brucellosis, including the methods approved for the serological diagnosis of infection. Results: In Isernia, a mountainous area where cattle ranching and traditional herding are widespread and culturally significant, brucellosis re-emerged in the period 2019-2021, when 30 outbreaks arose, 50% of outbreaks were linked to grazing practices. Outbreaks were promptly extinguished through veterinary intervention due to the low density of farms, which typically house only a few animals, and new cases have not been detected since 2022. The provinces of Caserta and Salerno present a different scenario, as they are major hubs for water buffalo breeding. The stringent tailored control measures, implemented in these provinces through a regional programme, led to a gradual decline in the prevalence of buffalo brucellosis outbreaks in Caserta, that involved 8,766 heads in 2019 and 6,164 heads in 2023, and in the eradication in Salerno, with 369 positive heads in 2019 brought to 0 since 2022. The Caserta programme specifically addresses the province's particular vulnerabilities, which include frequent flooding events and the presence of the largest and most densely concentrated water buffalo population in Italy. Discussion: The results highlight the fundamental importance of a One Health approach, which includes targeted interventions adapted to the specific context in which they are applied. This approach must actively involve key stakeholders, including farmers, researchers, public health authorities, and policymakers, and be supported by financial investments. Key components include strengthening biosecurity measures, implementing advanced animal traceability systems, continuous professional training programmes (including for farmers), expert-led information-sharing technologies, and promoting voluntary serological self-monitoring practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.