ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
Cladribine tablets in the new multiple sclerosis era.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Clinical Trial Efficacy to Real-World Effectiveness and Safety: Two-Year Outcomes of Cladribine in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The use of cladribine tablets in patients with MS beyond the age of 50: experiences from a large tertiary German centre.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Insights into adherence to cladribine tablets in the real world in multiple countries: results from patient support programs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- T cell-mediated immunodysregulation in multiple sclerosis: from pathogenic subsets to therapeutic advances.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Depression, Anxiety, and MSQOL-54 Outcomes in RRMS Patients Receiving Fingolimod or Cladribine: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by inflammatory demyelination that leads to irreversible neurological damage within the central nervous system (CNS). This review examines the therapeutic potential and clinical efficacy of cladribine tablets (CladT) for treating MS, focusing on the immune reconstitution mechanism and CNS effects. CladT represents a notable advance among disease-modifying therapies for MS due to its selective targeting of lymphocytes, resulting in sustained yet reversible immune modulation. This action leads to a substantial reduction in memory B cells while preserving the innate immune system and maintaining immunoglobulin levels, thereby mitigating the risks of secondary autoimmunity and infection. Cladribine appears to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, as indicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies from parenteral cladribine use. In MS, CladT is associated with reductions in CSF immunological markers, such as oligoclonal bands and neurofilament light chain levels; it also mitigates acute and chronic inflammation, as evidenced, respectively, by consistent reductions in unique active lesions, and significant decrease in slowly expanding lesions in patients with predominant grey matter damage. These findings underscore the potential of CladT in reducing disability accumulation and improving long-term clinical outcomes in patients with highly active disease. By synthesizing data from clinical trials and real-world studies, this review underscores the effectiveness of CladT in reducing relapse rates, disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging-detected disease activity and emphasizes the importance of early high-efficacy treatment for optimizing long-term outcomes. Furthermore, emerging biomarkers are discussed as potential tools for predicting individual responses to therapy, thereby enabling more personalized treatment strategies. This review also provides valuable insights into the positive impact of CladT on quality of life measures, long-term outcomes and safety profile, all of which support the use of CladT in the evolving landscape of MS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.